Another Quarter Peal for Josy

Having learned our lesson about warming up before starting a lengthy piece of handbell ringing, we were rewarded with a successful quarter peal:

Scottish Association
1 Albany Quadrant
Wednesday 19 October 2011
1260 Plain Bob Minor
1-2   Tina R Stoecklin
3-4   Simon J Gay (C)
5-6   Josy Shewell Brockway
First on an inside pair: 5-6

(or view the performance on Campanophile)

The girl did well, and even managed to ring a course of Kent on an inside pair afterwards.

On another topic, the star system we developed for helping Thomas to get a grip on the pairs in Plain Bob Minor doesn’t seem to be working all that well.  Though, frankly, we are never good at keeping up with this kind of thing.  Thomas finally confessed that he finds it too hard to count whilst ringing and was getting lost trying to do too many things at once.

So, we told him to not worry about counting and just ring it.  Last night we concentrated on rehearsing the opposites lead from the trebles, and when we put it together with the first two leads, we just carried on, and by golly he rang a Plain Course.  We think a bit more practice on the fourth lead and he will be ringing it with confidence.   He went to bed asking when he could ring a quarter peal.



Some Minor Fun Ringing

Our regular band was one short last night, so we rang a quarter peal of minor and named a method.  It is a six-bell version of something we have been ringing on 8 in the tower, and is a perfectly straightforward method on paper.

However, in handbells, the many places on the front made it a landmine field for swapping bells over.  It took us a few attempts to get to the end, but the final attempt came out good, and  with good ringing as well.

Scottish Association
1 Albany Quadrant
Monday 17 October 2011
1440 Kelvinbridge Surprise Minor
1-2   Tina R Stoecklin
3-4   Jonathan S Frye
5-6   Simon J Gay (C)
Kelvinbridge Surprise Minor: x36x14x12x1236x1234x36 le 16 (view the line)

(or see the quarter in Campanophile).

PS. While we were submitting the quarter peal, we found that our friend Robin Hall had been having fun with Abel in Shanghai.  Oh how we laughed….



Reward system for helping children to learn Plain Bob

Yesterday we had a Thomas-only session where we thoroughly rehearsed Plain Bob Minor lead by lead, one lead at a time.  It might be a bit of a cheat, but I rather think the key to learning ringing is to grab hold of any crutch to help you get a bit further, and that buys you time to learn to do without the crutch.


We haven’t often taken the time to explain about how Plain Bob works to our son Thomas, mostly because he really just wants to ring it.  However, his patience for the endless repitition to get this just by ringing it is a bit limited, and we also tend to do this pretty late in the day when everyone is a bit tired.

What he really needs to do is thoroughly memorise the pairs, and I decided to adapt the star system used in his school for memorising times tables.  There a bronze star is being able to recite the table, a silver star is when you can answer three random problems, and the gold star is when you can give the products of a given number in that table.    It is all verbal and hesitations mean you are sent gently back for more studying.  It is a good system because it forces one to thoroughly learn a times table from several different angles.

So in a cafe a couple of days ago, Thomas and I devised the following star system for learning the pairs in Plain Bob minor:

  • Bronze:  reciting the positions in the pair (ie:  lead-fourths, lead-fifths, etc.)
  • Silver: on being given a position and a direction, being able to say what the next position will be.  For example: 2nds and 4ths heading up; the answer is 3rds and 5ths (this needs some work on vocabulary when it comes to the opposites pair but you get the general idea).
  • Gold: ringing it without prompting.

We will let you know how it works out.

The Most Popular Handbell Methods on 12

Here is the Top 20 list on 12 bells, again from 1954 to 2010 with data from The usual comments apply to Spliced and Spliced Plain.

Rank Method Peals %
1 Stedman Cinques 421 22.1
2 Cambridge Surprise Maximus 255 13.4
3 Kent Treble Bob Maximus 226 11.9
4 Bristol Surprise Maximus 139 7.3
5 Plain Bob Maximus 134 7.0
6 Spliced Surprise Maximus 111 5.8
7 Yorkshire Surprise Maximus 77 4.0
8 Oxford Treble Bob Maximus 50 2.6
9 Lincolnshire Surprise Maximus 48 2.5
10 Spliced Maximus 41 2.2
11 Grandsire Cinques 34 1.8
12 Newgate Surprise Maximus 28 1.5
13 Little Bob Maximus 20 1.1
14 Superlative Surprise Maximus 16 0.8
15 Barford Surprise Maximus 14 0.7
16 Spliced Plain Maximus 13 0.7
17 Cantuar Alliance Maximus 12 0.6
18 Rigel Surprise Maximus 11 0.6
19 Pudsey Surprise Maximus 11 0.6
20 Avon Delight Maximus 10 0.5

How interesting that Stedman Cinques is the most popular method! I think the point about the preferences of individual bands is relevant here. The “Cornhill Vestry Band” is well known for ringing many peals of Stedman Cinques. It’s not exactly correct to describe this as one band, but my impression is that peals at Cornhill Vestry over the years have drawn on a pool of ringers, with a fairly regular core band, and only gradual changes of personnel. Anyway, the College Youths’ peal records show 224 handbell peals at Cornhill Vestry between 1953 and 2009 (not quite the same period as my data) and 210 peals of Stedman Cinques on handbells. I think a closer analysis (which I am not in a position to do at the moment) would show a very large overlap between these figures.


So, roughly speaking, it seems that the “Cornhill Vestry Band” has been responsible for around half of the peals of Stedman Cinques. If that band had preferred ringing Grandsire, or Kent, or Cambridge, or a range of methods, then the table would look rather different.

The Most Popular Handbell Methods on 10

Here is the Top 20 list for 10-bell handbell peals from 1954 to 2010, based on data from The comments about Spliced vs. Spliced Plain, from the 8-bell post, also apply here.

Rank Method Peals %
1 Plain Bob Royal 722 15.6
2 Kent Treble Bob Royal 608 13.2
3 Cambridge Surprise Royal 507 11.0
4 Stedman Caters 437 9.5
5 Spliced Surprise Royal 332 7.2
6 Yorkshire Surprise Royal 265 5.7
7 Grandsire Caters 263 5.7
8 London No.3 Surprise Royal 248 5.4
9 Oxford Treble Bob Royal 210 4.5
10 Bristol Surprise Royal 188 4.1
11 Lincolnshire Surprise Royal 148 3.2
12 Little Bob Royal 51 1.1
13 Pudsey Surprise Royal 42 0.9
14 Rutland Surprise Royal 41 0.9
15 Spliced Plain Royal 37 0.8
16 Littleport Little Surprise Royal 33 0.7
17 Spliced Royal 30 0.6
18 Superlative No.2 Surprise Royal 27 0.6
19 Spliced Treble Bob Royal 26 0.6
20 Swindon Surprise Royal 18 0.4

In comparison with the 8-bell list, Plain Bob is still top but with a lower proportion. Stedman is much further up – of course Stedman Caters is much easier than Stedman Triples. It’s interesting that the relative positions of Cambridge and Yorkshire are reversed with respect to the Major methods.


RSS feed Subscribe to Blog feed