Warm up for a quarter peal

So, we had a late and a bit of a rushed handbell ringing session with Josy on Wednesday.  After the great practice we had last week, we had determined that it was time to put Josy on our usual practice structure of a quarter peal attempt followed by some plain courses of something harder.

It was a lesson in remembering to be flexible for the different needs of different learning situations!  With Jonathan and Angela, we are accustomed to a ‘cold start’; that is, arriving, sitting down, up and down in rounds and off into the quarter.  It works well for that band: we are ready and concentrated.  False starts always put us off a bit to be honest.

It didn’t work so well for Josy.  The start was hesitant, and not smooth enough for keeping a good rhythm.  And Simon and I were making stupid errors (it was late for us to be doing that kind of thing).  So we stopped, rang some touches instead, and had another go at Kent, all keeping Josy off the trebles.  It was a useful session, and everything was much more fluent than the first touch.

I recall a conversation with Nick Jones a couple of weeks back, about the progress of his handbell band in Fort William.  They have one ringer who is both enthusiastic and time-poor.  So they need to do a lot of review each time they meet with her.  By the end of the session, she is ready to ring a quarter peal, but never at the beginning.

So, for future attempts with Josy, and possibly others, we need to do a warm-up before embarking on a quarter attempt.  Which is, on reflection, just a way of accomodating her experience level.  Our regular band is used to ringing quarters, and have the habit of quick starts in the tower well-ingrained.

The warm-up, or even a pre-quarter practice is a good habit to get into.  A practice session certainly helped the success of the quarters of Yorkshire rung on the last Scottish Handbell Day, and we did something similar when we were attempted a quarter of maximus last summer.

The Most Popular Handbell Methods on 8

Originally Posted on October 12, 2011 by Simon

Here are the Top 20 methods for peals on 8 bells. This time I have not combined the spliced peals quite as much as I did for the 6 bell table. The categories of spliced are a little unclear, because they come directly from PealBase’s summary table and I haven’t looked at the peal reports themselves. I think Spliced Major probably includes a lot of peals of Spliced Plain and Little Bob, but it also includes, for example, peals of Spliced Bristol and Double Norwich. Very likely there are also peals of Plain and Little in the Spliced Plain category. Spliced Treble Bob, on closer inspection, is almost entirely in 2 methods, and I’m betting that almost all of these are Kent and Oxford.

Rank Method Peals %
1 Plain Bob Major 3350 30.6
2 Kent Treble Bob Major 1248 11.4
3 Spliced Surprise Major 1099 10.1
4 Yorkshire Surprise Major 824 7.5
5 Cambridge Surprise Major 530 4.8
6 Oxford Treble Bob Major 458 4.2
7 Bristol Surprise Major 411 3.8
8 London Surprise Major 327 3.0
9 Lincolnshire Surprise Major 263 2.4
10 Spliced Treble Bob Major 243 2.2
11 Grandsire Triples 221 2.0
12 Stedman Triples 216 2.0
13 Superlative Surprise Major 185 1.7
14 Spliced Plain Major 182 1.7
15 Rutland Surprise Major 165 1.5
16 Double Norwich Court Bob Major 153 1.4
17 Pudsey Surprise Major 127 1.2
18 Spliced Major 110 1.0
19 Little Bob Major 75 0.7
20 St Clement’s College Bob Major 73 0.7

I stopped at 20 for consistency with the 6 bell table, but I can also reveal that Glasgow comes in at number 21 and Belfast at number 24.


I don’t think there are any big surprises in this table. Even if all kinds of spliced are combined, they are still a long way behind Plain Bob Major (but ahead of Kent). It’s interesting that in the annual breakdown, the preference for Yorkshire over Cambridge only became clearly established in the 1970s.

The Most Popular Handbell Methods on 6

I have been doing some analysis of the most popular handbell methods, as measured by numbers of peals. The data comes from Andrew Craddock’s excellent www.pealbase.co.uk. PealBase goes back to 1954 at the moment, and in order to consider complete years, I have stopped at 2010. So that’s 57 years of data, including a total of 24,526 handbell peals. (The total number of peals during the same period is 242,984).


Here are the Top 20 methods. “Spliced” includes all peals in more than one method, even those that are not normally reported as spliced (e.g. 7 minor in separate extents). The percentage is out of all handbell peals on 6 bells.

Rank Method Peals %
1 Spliced Minor 3509 50.5
2 Plain Bob Minor 1950 28.1
3 Spliced Doubles 309 4.4
4 Cambridge Surprise Minor 201 2.9
5 Plain Bob Doubles 110 1.6
6 Kent Treble Bob Minor 108 1.6
7 Grandsire Doubles 103 1.5
8 Oxford Treble Bob Minor 96 1.4
9 Stedman Doubles 39 0.6
10 London Surprise Minor 35 0.5
11 St Clement's College Bob Minor 32 0.5
12 Double Bob Minor 25 0.4
13 Norwich Surprise Minor 17 0.2
14 Single Oxford Bob Minor 15 0.2
15 York Surprise Minor 12 0.2
16 Bourne Surprise Minor 12 0.2
17 Netherseale Surprise Minor 8 0.1
18 Double Oxford Bob Minor 8 0.1
19 Reverse Bob Minor 8 0.1
20 Durham Surprise Minor 7 0.1

I want to look at the data in more detail in a future post, especially to do some breaking down by year. Here are a few initial comments.

Spliced Minor has always been popular, but really took off in the late 1990s, following the development of new compositions allowing the "Standard 41" Surprise Minor to be rung in a normal peal length. Peals of Doubles were more popular in the 1950s and 1960s, but are relatively rare nowadays.

My impression is that the popularity of methods for handbell peals can be significantly affected by the activities of particular bands, in a way that is much less likely with tower bell peals. For example, from the 1950s to the early 1960s there were a lot of peals of Spliced Doubles, and I’m guessing that many of them involved the same people.

London on a good day

Having dedicated September to mastering Bristol Surprise Major, our regular band is now focussed on getting to grips with London.  We have limped to the end of a plain course a few times, but last night we attempted our first quarter.

Unsurprisingly, it didn’t go.  It didn’t go about six times.  However, each time we got a little further, and rang a little better.  Frankly, I felt pretty good about it.  It was miles better than our first attempts at Bristol, which must mean something. Given that I had only managed to rehearse one pair beforehand, and the composition exposed me to all three pairs, I was feeling not too bad.  Well, I was pretty bad – but not irretrievably bad.   This feels within our reach.

Afterwards, we had a discussion about ringing speeds, and about how we tended to ring more slowly than, say, our esteemed colleagues in Penrith.  So, we did some speed trials ringing Yorkshire, using both a stopwatch, and comparing our speed with the ‘ideal’ peal speed on Abel (2 hours 20 minutes).

Our conclusions?  Well, we didn’t find the Abel pace too hard to match: it didn’t feel impossibly speedy.  However, the overall time was slowed down by mistakes (we didn’t manage the transition to London to Yorkshire very quickly), and our habit of waiting when one of us was a bit late striking.  However, we agreed that we couldn’t ring that fast in a method we were all trying to learn at the same time. And because we had been spending a lot of time pushing our method boundaries, we had gotten into the habit of a fairly stately pace even when we knew the method well.

Getting to know your pairs

After the last Scottish Handbell Day, we had a bit of a rest from our labours, but managed to meet with Josy for some more ringing practice last week.

Josy had a great handbell day.  Not only did she ring her first quarter peal (Plain Bob Minor of course), but she also got some extensive practice ringing on eight, and several goes at ringing Kent (due in part to a doomed quarter attempt – out of every cloud etc etc).

So when we met to ring again, it was clear she was ringing with greater confidence.  We rang some Plain Bob with her on an inside pair, some more Kent, and then rattled off some Little Bob, first on the trebles and then inside.  She’s reaching a stage where she is confident enough to try things without having to rehearse them extensively beforehand, and with little enough discussion.  It was great fun.

This is when the time spent repeating plain courses of plain bob over and over again, and the boring repititve project of embedding those classic handbell pairs really pays off.  It doesn’t tell you a lot about how to ring new methods, but it adds familiarity.

Embedding those pairs means that you don’t have to think too hard about the shape of the next few changes.  For example, say you come down at backstroke in 2nd and 5th places. Having your pairs well-embedded means that you instantly know a lot of information:  you know you are in opposites, you know that your next positition is first and last, and you know you will cross with yourself in 3-4.

If you know this instantly, then you don’t have to slow down and have a think or a panic when there is a bob.  Or, like we did with Josy, you can start to play around with other plain or simple treble bob methods.  You can start to take those pairs apart and put them together in new ways, on the fly.  It allows you to find the familiar parts of an unfamiliar method, and use those sections to rest your brain a bit, and save the hard processing for when you need it.


RSS feed Subscribe to Blog feed