Superlative success at last, and on to Pudsey

Yesterday we scored our peal of Superlative, using the composition from my previous article. Most of the peal was quite good, after some initial settling down, although we did have a too-exciting rough patch very near the end. It was much easier with 5-6 coursing throughout. Something to watch out for in that composition is that in the blocks of middles, at the calls 5-6 become the place bells corresponding to a call at wrong on the tenors, i.e. 5th and 7th place bells; conversely, in the blocks of wrongs, 5-6 become the place bells corresponding to a call at middle on the tenors, i.e. 6th and 8th place bells.

Our plan with Mike and Ian is to ring a peal of Pudsey next, to complete the right-place methods from the standard 8. After that, there are several directions we could choose. We could stick with single right-place methods such as Uxbridge, Lessness or Cornwall. We could try spliced Cambridge, Yorkshire, Lincolnshire and Rutland, and then perhaps work up to 6-spliced with Superlative and Pudsey. Or we could tackle Bristol, with the goal of moving on to London and eventually 8-spliced.

For the immediate next goal of Pudsey, I need to find a good composition. I haven't seen many that claim to be handbell-friendly. Here's one by Roger Bailey with 18 courses of coursing for 5-6 (like Superlative and Bristol, starting at the snap in Pudsey means that 5-6 are coursing). It's rather long, and it doesn't look easy to shorten it.

5376 Pudsey Surprise Major
Roger Bailey

(42536) M  W  H
 54236        -
 65432  2     s
 34562     2  2
 62543  -  -  s
(34526) -  -  -
3 part.
Snap start and finish.
5-6 ring 18 courses of 7-8 position. True to all Bc.

Another one from is a standard composition by Edwin A Barnett, rotated so that 3-4 are fixed at the part end. It has 63% (14 courses) coursing for 3-4, and a nice simple calling.

5184 Pudsey Surprise Major
Edwin A Barnett (rotated)

23456  B  M  W  H
54632     –  –  3
26354  3
53462     –  –  3
3 part.

This one by Chris Adams has an appealing 6-part structure.

5376 (5058) Pudsey Surprise Major
Chris Adams

23456    M  W  H
64352    -     -  
53246    -  -     
34265    s  2   
6 part. For 5058 call Bob for Single in last part and omit 2W.  

I've called it for Yorkshire in the past - one interesting point is that it can also be shortened to 5058 for Yorkshire, but in a different way, by replacing the 2W by sW in the last part. It's not an easy handbell composition, because 5-6 don't have any coursing at all.

I'm inclined towards the Barnett composition, unless I find anything better between now and the peal attempt.

Update on Horton's Four

We are half way through a Horton's Four weekend - we attempted the peal this morning, and we're going for it again tomorrow afternoon. So what happened? After a short false start, we rang quite decently for two hours, right up to the beginning of the split tenors section. Then suddenly the composition went out of my head.

I think the problem was that at the beginning of the course in which the tenors become split, I didn't mentally rehearse the calling for the whole course. After changing into Glasgow, which is the last tenors-together lead, I realised that I didn't know what was coming next. I managed to call a bob at the end of Glasgow, and just about remembered to change to Belfast, but that was it. The only thing coming into my mind was the calling for the penultimate course of the peal, but I knew that wasn't right. Desperately trying to remember the composition meant that I couldn't concentrate on Belfast, so I became completely lost, and that was the end of that.

I need to remember the procedure for calling spliced: during every lead, make a mental note of what I have to call at the lead end, and from time to time, think further ahead so that I know which courses are coming up.

On the positive side, it went much better than the last time we went for the whole peal, and that's the longest we've rung it for in a continuous session. So we are optimistic for tomorrow.

Update on the update: we had another good attempt and got well into the split tenors section, but collapsed in the penultimate course. Next attempt is in two weeks' time.

Superlative Again

Back in March, I wrote about compositions of Superlative, in advance of a peal attempt with Mike and Ian. We didn't get that peal, and yesterday we had another go and failed again. Perhaps there was another attempt in between; I don't remember. Despite the possibilities for compositions that keep 5-6 coursing, or even both 5-6 and 3-4, I have been sticking to Pitstow's, which is easy to remember but not very handbell-friendly. 

5088 Superlative Surprise Major
Nathan J Pitstow

B  W  H  23456
   -  3  52436
   -  3  35426
-     2  23564
3 part.

All of the maximum-coursing compositions that I have found either use half-lead bobs (the Don Morrison composition that I discussed previously), or non-standard calls (the arrangement that I put together in the previous article), or look complicated to learn.

Today I thought again about compositions with 5-6 coursing, and I wondered about doing something based on Andrew Hudson's peal of Plain Bob Major. The first step is to try out the basic block that keeps 5-6 coursing and moves them from one end of the coursing order to the other, and back. Ringing it twice gives 8 courses.

1792 Superlative Surprise Major

M  W  H  (25364)
   s  s   53624
s         43526
-     -   65324
   -      26354
   s  s   63524
s         43625
-     -   56324
   -      25364
Snap start and finish.

That's a good start, so we just need to add another 15 courses. We can do this by finding places where 5-6 are at one end or the other of the coursing order, and inserting a block of calls on the other three bells. Here is the final composition.

5152 Superlative Surprise Major
Simon J Gay

M  W  H  (25364)
4  s  s   53624
s  6      43526
-     -   65324
   -      26354
3  s  s   63524
s  6      43625
-     -   56324
   -      25364
Snap start and finish.
4 = -s-s
6 = --s--s
For handbells: 5-6 course throughout, 3-4 ring 70% coursing, 22% 3-4 and 9% 5-6.

Probably this also looks complicated, but having worked it up from a simple structure, I will find it easy to remember. We've got another attempt for the peal next week, so I think I will give this composition a try.

I constructed and checked this composition with the help of Graham John's excellent online composition library, which also works out the analysis of handbell positions.

The 17th Scottish Handbell Day

We had a handbell day on Saturday - a medium-sized one this time, with 15 people. We had advertised beginners' sessions in the morning, but in the end we didn't get any beginners, so the programme was the usual combination of practice sessions and quarters.

We rang four quarters: one of Lincolnshire Major, one of Yorkshire Major, and two of Kent Royal. Practice sessions covered Plain Bob Minor and Major, Little Bob Major, Kent Minor and Major, Yorkshire Major and Cambridge Royal. We must have tired everyone out, because most people went home fairly early, so we didn't get around to our traditional exploration of higher numbers after dinner.

What is the best quarter peal composition of Kent Royal for handbells? Peter Kirton called the first quarter, and chose (2H W) x 3, which is 1440. (It was his first quarter of Royal as conductor, as well as his first handbell quarter on 10 - well done!) It seemed reasonable, so I called it again for the second quarter. I commented that although there are many peal compositions in which 3-4 are always coursing between the Middle and Wrong positions (i.e. for the bulk of the course, except for the flurry of bobs around the course end), I didn't think it was possible to do the same for a quarter. The (2H W) x 3 calling, like other similar simple callings, has 3-4 coursing for two courses and in the 3-4 position for the other course.

It turns out that I was wrong. I have just checked and found this composition:

1440 Kent Treble Bob Royal

Roger Bailey

23456  M  W  H
42356        1
25463  2  2
64352  1  1
23456  1     1

For handbells: 3-4 always coursing between middle and wrong. 
Also true to Oxford Treble Bob, Clyde Surprise, and Lockington Surprise.

It's a little more complicated, but maybe I'll try it another time.

What about Lincolnshire? For Yorkshire, I usually call this composition, which keeps 3-4 coursing from the first Middle to the last Wrong:

1280 Yorkshire Surprise Major

J Eric Brosius

23456   B  M  W
54632      -  -
24536      2
65324   3
23456      -  -

Especially suitable for handbells (3-4 course throughout except for the first three and last three leads). Also true to Pudsey and all BCDFGJKNOabcdefXYZ.

The list of falseness groups that the composition is true to, doesn't include L falseness, which Lincolnshire has. And indeed, the composition is false to Lincolnshire. I called this old standby:

1250 Yorkshire Surprise Major

 23456   W   H
 34256       2
 52436   2   2
(32456)  s  
Rounds two blows after Wrong.

Also true to Lincolnshire. doesn't list any compositions of Lincolnshire that claim to be handbell-friendly. It would be interesting to look at the possibilities - maybe someone already has the answer and can put compositions in the comments.

Learning and calling compositions of spliced

We are still working on Horton's Four, but I won't have anything new to say about ringing it until we eventually score. Meanwhile, here are some thoughts about how I learn and call a difficult composition of spliced. I hope that readers who are better conductors will comment from their own experience. I must admit that most of this article isn't particularly handbell-specific.

I've done more of this kind of conducting on tower bells than on handbells, and my first comment is that on handbells I need to learn the composition much more thoroughly. Ringing the Horton's Four methods on handbells takes a lot of concentration, so I don't have the spare brainpower to think at length about what might be coming up next; there's no time to run over sections of composition in my mind to remind myself of how it works. I know Horton's Four much better now than I ever did when we rang it in the tower.

My approach is to build up my knowledge of the composition in a series of layers, with progressively more detail.

Layer 1: the sequence of methods and calls

This is the foundation for everything: it's the basic information that I need in order to call the composition, even if I lose track of coursing orders or anything else. I learn the sequence of method abbreviations (usually their initial letters), interspersed with the word "bob". I think of it as a series of lines, exactly as the composition is set out on the page. For example, here is the beginning of Horton's Four in the usual notation:

23456  M   B   W   H                  
35264      -           BBL.BFF        
42563  -           -   BLLG.BFBFLL.   
64523          -       GB.L           
26543          -       LG.B           
64235      -           FBFLLG.BFB     

I recite this to myself as follows: "B B L bob B F F; B L L G bob B F B F L L bob; ..." with a little pause at each course end. For this composition, I have simply learnt this sequence by rote. It takes many many repetitions until it sticks. It's like learning a poem, but much worse because of the complete lack of meaning. I divide the composition into sections and work on one section at a time. For Horton's Four I divided it into three roughly equal sections and a fourth, longer, section for the split tenors block. Later I realised that there is a more natural division into three sections, because the course ends 12356478 and 12364578 come up approximately one third and two thirds of the way through.

The exception to the system of learning the sequence of method initials is when there are several consecutive leads of the same method. At one point in Horton's Four there are five consecutive leads of Glasgow. Instead of counting five leads, I know that the block finishes with a bob at home, and I just ring Glasgow until I get to the right point to call a home. It's a golden rule of conducting to avoid counting as much as possible; it's safer to work with landmarks.

I usually start with the first section until I have mastered it, then move on to the second section, and so on. After that I start reciting the whole composition from the beginning. This tends to result in knowing the beginning of the composition better than the end. Bernard Taylor once told me that he starts with the last section, because he prefers to know the end of the composition very thoroughly and reckons that if necessary he can struggle through the early courses until he gets onto more familiar ground.

There are other ways of trying to make the rote learning easier. Sometimes it's possible to make words out of short sequences of methods. This doesn't work for Horton's Four because there aren't any vowels. Someone, I think it was Robin Hall, suggested using E instead of F for Belfast. Another possibility is to construct sentences whose words start with the letters in the composition. One has stuck in my mind, which definitely came from Robin Hall, although I have no idea which composition it relates to: Bernard nearly nobbles Chris, but clever Chris lunges neatly back, shouting "little bastard". Going by the letters, perhaps it's from a peal of 8-spliced.

Some conductors learn the sequence of methods without including the bobs, and separately learn the bobs in terms of whether they are wrongs, middles, homes and so on. They then integrate the bobs and the methods while calling the composition. I prefer the security of having the complete sequence of methods and bobs as a single stream, because that's exactly what has to be called.

Layer 2: the calling positions

Next I learn which calling positions the bobs are in. The first course of Horton's Four has a before, the second course has a middle and a home, the third course has a wrong, and so on. This information is connected to the first layer, because obviously there's a correspondence between a calling position and a sequence of methods that gets the tenor to that calling position. For example, the BBL in the first course would take the tenor to 2nd place bell, so the bob is a before. Familiarity with the place bell orders of the methods, and with the shapes of courses that can be constructed from them, makes it easier to see how it all fits together. For example, the course LG.L obviously has a bob at wrong because Glasgow with a bob becomes a Cambridge place bell order, and LCL is a well-known three-lead course with the wrong calling position after the second lead. In a composition with a greater variety of place bell orders, or with less familiar place bell orders, it is less clear how the calling positions fit into the sequence of leads, so there is also a lot of rote learning in this layer. 

Layer 3: landmarks and checkpoints

I like to learn some distinctive course ends and/or coursing orders that come up at strategic points in the composition. For example, in Horton's Four, the course end 12356478 occurs at the end of the 7th course (which is FFBFBFF.F). The course end 12364578 occurs later on, at the end of the course L.B.B.G.B.L which is shortly before the beginning of the split tenors section. I learn these so that I can check that the ringing is correct, rather than to be able to jump us onto the right change if things have gone wrong. If a checkpoint doesn't come up properly, we can stop at that point instead of waiting to find that the peal doesn't come round at the end.

Sometimes coursing orders are more useful than course ends. I don't think I can transpose the coursing orders in the split tenors section of Horton's Four, but there is a course with two consecutive leads of London in the coursing order 457236. This coursing order has mnemonic features: it's three two-digit multiples of 9; the last two digits (36) are half of the middle two digits (72). Also I find it relatively easy to observe the coursing order in London. So this is a potentially useful checkpoint a couple of courses into the most difficult part of the peal. Another coursing order a little later in the split tenors section is 437256, which is good because both 3-4 and 5-6 are coursing.

Layer 4: practising the coursing order transpositions

I have spent a lot of time running through the coursing order transpositions in my mind, to develop familiarity with the coursing orders that come up and the way that the composition moves between them. In a previous article I wrote about the idea of using the coursing orders as a way of remembering the calling; it all helps. In Horton's Four, I'm not trying to memorise all the coursing orders, but they now seem familiar and expected as I transpose them throughout the peal (at least in the tenors-together section). If I miscall it, which happened in this week's practice, it becomes obvious because the wrong coursing orders appear.

Calling the composition

Assuming that the composition has been thoroughly learnt so that it can be recited flawlessly, it's then a question of playing it back at the right speed (much slower than practice recitation speed) and balancing the mental attention between the composition, the coursing order and the methods. The point about the right speed is significant. Reciting the composition at high speed develops a certain rhythm, but when the rhythm is lost by feeding out the sequence of methods more slowly, it can suddenly seem much less obvious what comes next. Mentally reciting a short section at speed, to build up momentum again, can help, but risks diverting too much attention from ringing the methods.

Soon after the beginning of each lead, I like to mentally prepare exactly what I'm going to say at the end of the lead. This might be a change of method, with or without a bob, or it might be nothing if there are consecutive leads of the same method. As the lead end approaches, I take care to make the calls at exactly the right moment: bob during the change of the treble's backstroke snap, change of method during the change of the treble's handstroke lead. If there is a bob, I do the coursing order transposition before making the call, roughly when the treble is moving between 3-4 and 1-2. This means that if there is a problem at the lead end, I'm ready to tell people which place bells they are becoming.

When the easier methods come up, I try to think ahead a little so that I know what's coming next in the composition. I hate mistakes in Bristol, not because they seriously jeopardise the ringing (we are pretty good at recovering in Bristol, these days), but because I rely on those leads for a little bit of respite and the chance to make sure I'm not going to run out of calls. It's an enormous distraction to have to start announcing when the points and half lead occur.

The most important duty of the conductor is to call the composition correctly; it's much more important than ringing the methods perfectly. I remember calling a peal of 8-Spliced Royal on tower bells, a long time ago, in which I became completely lost towards the end of a lead; nevertheless I managed to call a bob and a change of method at exactly the right point; the rest of the band helped me to recover in the next lead and we scored the peal. That would be much more difficult on handbells, of course.


RSS feed Subscribe to Blog feed